Home · Message + FAQ · Submit · Q&A · About the Page · About the Authour · Archive · RSS ·
nonplussedbyreligion:

rationalhub:

Yep, this. There was a Sagan quote on similar lines, but since I’ve not posted any Steven Pinker quotes. :)

This quote is part of Pinker’s answer to the question: Can You Believe in God and Evolution?  His complete answer was:
It’s natural to think that living things must be the handiwork of a designer. But it was also natural to think that the sun went around the earth. Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Our own bodies are riddled with quirks that no competent engineer would have planned but that disclose a history of trial-and-error tinkering: a retina installed backward, a seminal duct that hooks over the ureter like a garden hose snagged on a tree, goose bumps that uselessly try to warm us by fluffing up long-gone fur.
The moral design of nature is as bungled as its engineering design. What twisted sadist would have invented a parasite that blinds millions of people or a gene that covers babies with excruciating blisters? To adapt a Yiddish expression about God: If an intelligent designer lived on Earth, people would break his windows.
The theory of natural selection explains life as we find it, with all its quirks and tragedies. We can prove mathematically that it is capable of producing adaptive life forms and track it in computer simulations, lab experiments and real ecosystems. It doesn’t pretend to solve one mystery (the origin of complex life) by slipping in another (the origin of a complex designer).
Many people who accept evolution still feel that a belief in God is necessary to give life meaning and to justify morality. But that is exactly backward. In practice, religion has given us stonings, inquisitions and 9/11. Morality comes from a commitment to treat others as we wish to be treated, which follows from the realization that none of us is the sole occupant of the universe. Like physical evolution, it does not require a white-coated technician in the sky.
Can You Believe in God and Evolution? Time Magazine, August 7, 2005
~ Kim

nonplussedbyreligion:

rationalhub:

Yep, this. There was a Sagan quote on similar lines, but since I’ve not posted any Steven Pinker quotes. :)

This quote is part of Pinker’s answer to the question: Can You Believe in God and Evolution?  His complete answer was:

It’s natural to think that living things must be the handiwork of a designer. But it was also natural to think that the sun went around the earth. Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.

Our own bodies are riddled with quirks that no competent engineer would have planned but that disclose a history of trial-and-error tinkering: a retina installed backward, a seminal duct that hooks over the ureter like a garden hose snagged on a tree, goose bumps that uselessly try to warm us by fluffing up long-gone fur.

The moral design of nature is as bungled as its engineering design. What twisted sadist would have invented a parasite that blinds millions of people or a gene that covers babies with excruciating blisters? To adapt a Yiddish expression about God: If an intelligent designer lived on Earth, people would break his windows.

The theory of natural selection explains life as we find it, with all its quirks and tragedies. We can prove mathematically that it is capable of producing adaptive life forms and track it in computer simulations, lab experiments and real ecosystems. It doesn’t pretend to solve one mystery (the origin of complex life) by slipping in another (the origin of a complex designer).

Many people who accept evolution still feel that a belief in God is necessary to give life meaning and to justify morality. But that is exactly backward. In practice, religion has given us stonings, inquisitions and 9/11. Morality comes from a commitment to treat others as we wish to be treated, which follows from the realization that none of us is the sole occupant of the universe. Like physical evolution, it does not require a white-coated technician in the sky.

Can You Believe in God and Evolution? Time Magazine, August 7, 2005

~ Kim

(via project-argus)



Posted on Sunday, July 1, 2012 | 150 notes
· #religion #humanactions #science
Previous Post | Next Post

  1. christoph-and-his-waltz reblogged this from amiry
  2. amiry reblogged this from project-argus
  3. omgwtfitskean reblogged this from rationalhub
  4. thekingsthoughts reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  5. onlystreetlights reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  6. spam420 reblogged this from divineirony
  7. some-wicked-little-town reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  8. callmelogic reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  9. the-lost-tree reblogged this from stardustandwands
  10. galileo-messier reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  11. cracks-in-the-ceiling reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  12. acleveruser reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  13. collectionsofquotes reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  14. stardustandwands reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  15. jmollegaard reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  16. tonynacho reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  17. highly-low-places reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  18. jeffreytwinger reblogged this from thescienceofreality and added:
    Yep, this. There was a Sagan quote on similar lines, but since I’ve not posted any Steven Pinker quotes. :)
  19. dieu-trahi reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  20. decadentscience reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  21. thescienceofreality reblogged this from project-argus